Sign in or 

| 1. Discussing reading comprehension strategies |
| 2. Supporting our answer choices with pertinent textual evidence |
| 3. Explaining the reasons for the incorrectness of some answer choices |
| 4. Writing text-specific interpretive responses |
| 5. Supporting our text-specific interpretive response with pertinent textual evidence |
| 6. Evaluating our participation using a criteria/rubric |
| Exemplary (90 -100 points) | Exemplary (90 -100 points) | Acceptable (80 -89) | Call 911 (50-79) |
| 1. Students answered the question correctly. | |||
| 2. Students supported response with three pertinent textual evidence | |||
| 3. Students explained the multi-step thinking process that they followed in choosing the correct answer choice. | |||
| 4. Students explained the reasons for the incorrectness of the other three answer choices |
| 1. Has to clearly, effectively, precisely and simply answer the question |
| 2. Support their position/opinion/argument/claim with relevant textual evidence Reminder: 1. The textual evidence needs to flow naturally into students own words 2. Textual evidence can be in the form of an embedded quote, paraphrase, or direct quotation. |
| 3. The position/opinion/argument/claim has to be insightful, (has real world/universal application) (Isn't it amazing?/wonderful?/powerful?/profound?/interesting?/cool?/tight?/ |
| 4. It shows effective use of conventions such correct spelling, capitalization, usage and punctuation. |
MSRAMOS |
Latest page update: made by MSRAMOS
, Jan 25 2008, 10:53 AM EST
(about this update
About This Update
Edited by MSRAMOS
142 words deleted view changes - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
None
More Info: links to this page
|